The defence focused on whether Ms. T’s right to counsel was meaningfully respected after arrest.
After being stopped near the Don Valley Parkway, Ms. T was arrested for impaired driving and taken to the station. She immediately requested to speak with a specific lawyer. Police attempted contact once but proceeded with breath testing shortly afterward, despite:
We reviewed the booking video, phone logs, and breath room recordings to determine how much time elapsed between the request for counsel and the breath demand.
We evaluated whether police fulfilled their constitutional obligation to provide a reasonable opportunity to consult counsel of choice. This involved examining not just whether a call was made, but whether the effort was genuinely meaningful.
In court, the arresting officer conceded that no second attempt was made to reach the requested lawyer.
We argued that proceeding prematurely undermined the purpose of the right to counsel. The protection exists to ensure informed decision-making before providing potentially incriminating evidence.
The court concluded that police failed to provide a reasonable opportunity to access counsel of choice before administering breath tests. The breath samples were excluded.
With no admissible evidence of blood-alcohol concentration, the prosecution stayed the charges.
Case Study
“I was facing my third DUI charge in Toronto and thought jail was unavoidable. The charges were ultimately withdrawn. I got my life back.”
“After being stopped at a RIDE checkpoint, I was terrified about losing my license permanently. The case was dismissed.”
“DUI Lawyer Toronto negotiated with the Crown and avoided jail time entirely. Their professionalism in court was impressive.”
“From the first consultation, I felt supported and informed. My case was resolved without custody.”