Over 80 Charge Dismissed After Breathalyzer Records Questioned

Challenge

Ms. K was charged with operating over 80 mg after providing breath samples at a Toronto police division. The readings were marginally over the legal limit.

The defence examined whether the approved instrument had been properly maintained and calibrated in accordance with regulatory standards.

Disclosure revealed:

Incomplete maintenance logs

Gaps in annual inspection documentation

Unclear notation regarding the simulator solution used

Our Process

themis figurine in front of canada flag
01

Planning the case

We conducted a line-by-line review of calibration and maintenance records. The qualifications of the breath technician and compliance with required testing protocols were closely examined.

02

Technical Review

We compared documentation against statutory and regulatory requirements governing approved instruments. Any inconsistency or missing record was identified and analyzed for impact.

03

Cross-Examination

Under questioning, the technician was asked to explain specific log entries and maintenance intervals. Uncertainty regarding those records raised reliability concerns.

04

Reliability Argument

We argued that breath readings are only as reliable as the procedures behind them. When foundational compliance cannot be clearly established, the presumption of accuracy may be undermined.

Result

The court found that the Crown failed to establish the necessary evidentiary foundation for the breath readings. Without reliable breath evidence, the prosecution could not prove the over 80  offence. Ms. K was acquitted.

Case Study

Contact Card

Contact us now for full support

Contact us now