Ms. K was charged with operating over 80 mg after providing breath samples at a Toronto police division. The readings were marginally over the legal limit.
The defence examined whether the approved instrument had been properly maintained and calibrated in accordance with regulatory standards.
Disclosure revealed:
We conducted a line-by-line review of calibration and maintenance records. The qualifications of the breath technician and compliance with required testing protocols were closely examined.
We compared documentation against statutory and regulatory requirements governing approved instruments. Any inconsistency or missing record was identified and analyzed for impact.
Under questioning, the technician was asked to explain specific log entries and maintenance intervals. Uncertainty regarding those records raised reliability concerns.
We argued that breath readings are only as reliable as the procedures behind them. When foundational compliance cannot be clearly established, the presumption of accuracy may be undermined.
The court found that the Crown failed to establish the necessary evidentiary foundation for the breath readings. Without reliable breath evidence, the prosecution could not prove the over 80 offence. Ms. K was acquitted.
Case Study
“I was facing my third DUI charge in Toronto and thought jail was unavoidable. The charges were ultimately withdrawn. I got my life back.”
“After being stopped at a RIDE checkpoint, I was terrified about losing my license permanently. The case was dismissed.”
“DUI Lawyer Toronto negotiated with the Crown and avoided jail time entirely. Their professionalism in court was impressive.”
“From the first consultation, I felt supported and informed. My case was resolved without custody.”